327.6 Proof

The CAO needs to confirm that an individual is a specified relative only if the CAO has reason to question the individual's statement. In that case, the CAO must confirm the following:           55 Pa. Code § 201.4(1)(iv)

 

 

The following papers can be used as proof:          55 Pa. Code § 205.4(d)

 

 

Some papers on their own may not be proof of a relationship between the child and the specified relative. When the relative is not a parent, the CAO does not need to confirm the relationship of the relative to the child's parent. Verification is only needed if the CAO has reason to question the relative’s statement.

 

Example: Nancy Gordon, age 38, applies for NMP for herself and her great-nephew, Dustin Lewis, age 3. Dustin's father is Ms. Gordon's nephew. Dustin's parents, Dan Ward and Vivian Lewis, are not married. Ms. Gordon presents the following documents to verify her relationship to Dustin:

 

Proof of relationship is sometimes not available when the child lives with relatives of a putative father and the putative father's location is unknown. The CAO must make a decision using all available information on the child's relationship to the relative and must include notes of the information used in the case record.

 

If information about the relationship from different sources does not match, and if no one can show any papers proving the relationship, then the CAO can accept a written statement from a third party that the caretaker/relative is related to the parent whose child he or she is in care and control of.

 

Proof of an individual providing a home for a child includes, but is not limited to, the following:

 

Updated February 14, 2012, Replacing July 8, 2008